2105

Carolyn E. Lamb, Daniel G. Brown, Charles L. A. Clarke

Bridges

2015

37-44

Proceedings of Bridges 2015: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture , براي مشاهده و دانلود مقاله به لينك مدارك مرتبط مراجعه نماييد

Good computational poetry requires sufficiently interesting poetic phrases to be generated or chosen. Different metrics for determining what makes a sufficiently interesting phrase have rarely been directly compared. We directly compare of a number of metrics—topicality, sentiment, and concrete imagery—by collecting human judgments on each metric for the same data set of human-generated phrases, then having humans judge computationally generated poems chosen to include high-scoring phrases against each other. We find through a quantitative analysis that the output of at least some of these metrics is perceived as better than output using none of these metrics.

,/DL/Data Entry/Edit/AddToCompilation.aspx,/DL/Data Entry/NewEdit/Documents/Math_English_Electronic_Articles_EditCompile_454.aspx